March 5, 2008

Syrian Christians of Kerala

Our bus departed from Ernakulam, the "new" city a ferry ride across the harbor from historic Cochin (in terms of geography, Cochin is San Francisco proper to Ernakulam's Oakland); our destination, the city of Kottayam. The road from Ernakulam to Kottayam crosses over backwaters and the very first foothills of the Western Ghats, the scenery varying from palm trees crowding wide waterways to rubber trees planted in rows, healing from their harvest. The small towns we passed through however are notable not only for their picturesque scenery, but also for their places of worship--even for Kerala, where Christianity is well-known, there are countless churches in these towns, some new some old, seemingly far outnumbering Hindu temples or mosques. Schools tend to be named St. George, St. Anthony or St. Thomas, and even the occasional nun is sighted.


When one thinks of Christianity in India, the first thought is usually to the Catholic community in Goa, a remnant of the Portuguese empire in the East, but the actual history of Christianity in India goes much further back, all the way to apostolic times according to legend. According to the apochryphal Acts of Judas Thomas (apochryphal meaning that it is not one of the books generally recognized to be part of the Christian Bible), St. (Doubting) Thomas, one of Jesus's twelve disciples, traveled from the Holy Land to India, spreading the gospel and eventually achieving martyrdom. Legend has it that he established churches in the now Keralan coast and the legendary site of his martyrdom in Chennai is graced with a church.


The "Thomas Christians" of India maintained links with the Christians of the Near East. One of the most significant delegations, in the fourth century, consisted of seventy-two families, roughly four hundred strong, who traveled from what is now Syria to the Keralan coast, descendants of which group survive today (more on this later). Further spiritual support continued over the centuries from the Middle East through the Syrian Christian Church, giving these Christians of India the name "Syrian Christians." The Christians were fruitful and multiplied, and formed a significant community (of around 30,000) by the time the Portuguese arrived in the 16th century.


The first major fissure in the Syrian Christian community of India happened as a result of Portuguese control, and the road from Ernakulam to Kottayam took us by the key site of Diamper. Initially the Portuguese looked favorably upon the fellow Christians (it is said that one goal of Portuguese explorations beyond the Cape of Good Hope was to search for a legendary eastern Christian kingdom), but then grew hostile as the Thomas Syrian Christians refused to pledge allegiance to the Pope in Rome and adhere to Roman Catholic doctrine. Finally, the Portuguese convened the Synod of Diamper in 1599 to cleanse the Thomas Syrian Christians of doctrinal impurities, which they saw as coming both from Nestorian heresies and from Hindu contamination. The Portuguese banned books, burned books and records and instituted other oppressive policies. When an emissary from Antioch was detained in now Chennai, some of the local Christians publicly revolted, taking the "Bent Cross Oath" at Mattancherry church (briefly described in my blog entry of March 3 and pictured below) in 1653. Others made peace with the Portuguese and the Roman Catholic church.


About two and a half hours after we left Ernakulam, our Kerala state bus arrived at Kottayam bus station, and we transferred into an autorickshaw to take us to some of Kerala's oldest existing Syrian Christian churches.

In the northern part of Kottayam, a center of the Syrian Christian community in Kerala, different sects (resulting from further schisms) are represented by churches steps apart, and demonstrate some of the later history of the Syrian Christians of India. Heading from east to west on Kumarakom Road, we first passed St. Thomas Mar Thoma Church.


The Mar Thoma Church is the product of a schism in the Indian Syrian Christian Church that occurred under the relatively more gentle control under British rule. A 19th century prelate educated in the British missionary system determined that the local church should undergo reforms, a position not shared by all of his peers, and founded the Mar Thoma Syrian Church, which has since entered into communion with the Anglican churches in India, the Church of North India and the Church of South India.

Heading west, we arrived at Cheriapally, "Small Church" or St. Mary's Orthodox Church. Founded in 1579, Cheriapally remains close to its original structure, featuring a porch similar to a Hindu temple, beautiful altar and murals and an impressive old baptismal font.



The facade of the church is overwhelmingly Portuguese in flavor, reflecting the era of its construction despite the Syrian Christians' doctrinal objections to Portuguese hegemony.



Cheriapally, as our church officer/guide explained to us, is an Orthodox Syrian Church, as opposed to a Jacobite Syrian Church. The 1912 schism defining these sects is perhaps the most significant and puzzling in the history of the Indian Syrian Christian Church. How did such an enduring, small and ancient community become divided yet again, this time less directly caused by outside colonial powers?

The history on this seems less certain, but it appears that the Syrian Christian Church hierarchy was damaged by a series of conflicts in the late 19th century, including a series of lawsuits brought over who had true authority over the church. The competing factions included those who believed that the Syrian Christian Church should adhere to existing indigenous dogma and practices, believed to be handed down from St. Thomas himself, against those who believed that the church should follow more closely the authority of the Patriarch of Antioch, the head of the Syrian Christians in the Near East. These differences were made more explicit in a synod called by the Patriarch of Antioch in 1876 to conform religious practice in India to that in the Near East. Finally, in 1912, the group favoring local authority invited the living "deposed" Patriarch of Antioch, Abdul Mesih, to India. It is not exactly clear why he was deposed, although some argue that the act was illegitimate because it was forced by the Ottoman Turkish authorities. Abdul Mesih in India established the so-called Orthodox Syrian Church, headed by a local Catholicate (based near Kottayam in a town called Devalokam), as a semiautonomous branch of the Syriac Orthodox Church. This move was not recognized by the "official" Patriarch at the time or his successors, or by the so-called Jacobite Syrian Christians, who favored the authority of the official Patriarch.

Less than a hundred yards west of Cheriapally, on a small hill, stands Valiapally, "Large Church" or St. Mary's Knanaya Church, one of the oldest existing Christian churches in Kerala.



Originally built just prior to Cheriapally, although much of the building does not speak from that date, the prizes of the church's collections include two ancient crosses carved in granite, one older and the other a replica, which contain inscriptions in Pahlavi and Syriac.



The church and its treasures belong to the Knanaya, who are descendants of the delegation that came to India from the Near East in the fourth century. The Knanaya have remained loyal to the Syriac Orthodox Church based in Damascus, and plaques and portraits inside Valiapally feature prominently the connection between the church and the mother church in the Near East.



Leaving Valiapally, I saw an elderly Indian lady, resplendent in sari and gold jewelry, step up to the hill on which the church sits, and cross herself. I did not know to which sect she belonged, and I suppose she may even have been Roman Catholic or Anglican, but through her gesture I imagined a continuity of almost two thousand years, from new Christians converted to a new and foreign God or descendants of voyagers from a distant land, taken root and somehow survived and even flourished despite great odds, even if now the trunk has borne many branches. And I wondered how this history would have played out in a different country, and whether India wasn't particularly fertile soil for not only new native religions but also ancient and exotic foreign religions, from eastern Christian sects to Zoroastrianism.

I have read that Indian Syrian Christian churches have now been established all over the world, following the migrations of Indian communities. Perhaps, in the years to come, there will be other divisions, or old differences will be reconciled. But the continuity of the tradition seems assured.

11 comments:

Neema said...

Fascinating that an outpost of an old Christian sect would survive in South India all these years.

Ipe George, B.Sc, B.D said...

Since you are interested in history, you many want to go through my blog and give me your comments

sudha said...

ur sight is good.
http://www.myhappyjourney.com

myhappyjourney said...

good.
http://www.myhappyjourney.com

myhappyjourney said...

good.
http://www.myhappyjourney.com

dburlison said...

Travel Safe-WORLD TRAVEL UPDATES-FOREIGN TRAVEL GUIDE:

http://www.travelaskthelocals.yolasite.com

Yogesh Kumar said...

Hi my name is yogesh kumar. I like this blog website due to the quality of a description about the travel of India. I say thanks to that person who made this
www.today-life-style.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

All the Hindu rituals, beliefs, customs followed by Christians before the Synod of Dampier are clear evidences to show that Syrians were converted from untouchables. Pariahs and Pulayas believed in transmigration and they offer even today flowers to dead souls thinking they would continue to bless them in transmigrated status. It is foolish to say that Christian children attended Hindu schools, for there were no Hindu schools at that time. Portuguese started theological schools and CMS missionaries started regular schools and colleges. As a matter of fact, Hindus vied with one another to get admission in CMS schools.Exorcism, astrology, marriage customs are similar to Hindu Pariahs and Pulayas and that is why the Synod wanted to civilize Syrian Christians. In dress, women were not allowed to cover their breasts, and that was the common practice not merely of untouchables from whom Syrians were converted, but even among caste Hindus such as Nambbodiris and Nairs. When Syrian immigrants married lower caste women, they were almost naked except a small piece of loin cloth to cover the genital area. So, like the Arab immigrants in Malabar, they stitched a collarless shirt called Chaatta (Tamil word for shirt) and a long piece of single cloth to cover the bottom portion from navel to calf called Mundu ( a Tamil word for dhoty) and the excess cloth was not cut off to avoid waste but frilled and tucked. Now most of the maid servants wear this dress, chatta and mundu. This pattern of dress is now being replaced with nighties by maid servants and Syrian women at home. The Synod wanted to civilize Syrian Christians because they wee all from untouchable castes. In the initial stage, a few West Asia immigrants would have married some untouchable women, like Anglo-Indians, but at a later stage it was mass marriage among untouchables who had become Christians. That is why they retained all the rituals of untouchable Hindus. Read Thurston’s customs. beliefs, marriage (Tali tying) of untouchables such as Pariahs, Pulayas, Mukkuvas, Kuravas and Ezhavas. Then you will understand how the Synod wanted to civilize and modernise Syrians who came from that stock. False identity claiming Namboodirii and Nair caste will boomrang, for Nairs and nambbodiris do not accept Syrians as converted from their castes. They ridicule and pooh-pooh these insane claims, ignoring historical and demographic evidences.

A.Yeshuratnam said...

Military Service of Syrians
Portuguese rule had serious consequences on the social status of Syrian Christians. Till the Portiuguese arrival, the vast majority of Syrian Christiasns had been eking out a living like other lower caste Hindus. Altough the earlier immigrant Christians from West Asia were treated well by the Kerala rulers by giving them, their wives from utouchable castes and their offspring certain privileges, when Christian population increased by intermarriages with lower castes (who alone were avaiolable for such marriages in a caste-ridden society) and conversion of lower castes, Christians gradually lost all the privileges and were treated on par with other lower castes.In Travancore they had to do oozhiyam service even after the British brought the State under their control. But during the brief period of Portuguese rule, Syrian Christians enjoyed real freedom. Their economic and social status was raised by the Portuguese. This aspect in Syrian history is overlooked by many historians because of the bickerings over the Synod of Dampier. Some St. Thomas Christians project the Portuguese as enemies and by attacking them they don the role of pretentious patriots.But patriotism often changed according to political circumstances. When the Portuguese first arrived, Syrian Christians were glad to receive them. K.M.Panikkar says they forgot all the help done by Hindu rulers and " at the very first opportunity, they hastened to disclaim their allegiance and to accept the sovereignty of the King of Portugal." He also quotes Kerala Pazhama which gives detailed information about the visit of Syrian Christians to Vasco da Gama and how they suurendered all their privileges and accepted the Portuguese king as their king.
The Portuguese exercised political supremacy in Kochi for about 150 years. Kochi Rjah was made a vassal of the Portuguese king. The crown of the Kochi Rajah was made in, and sent from Portugal. During this period, the Portuguese extended all privileges to Syrian Christians.They were glad to see Christians in a foreign country and wanted to make them their loyal ally. Native rulers used Syrian Christians as mercenaries in their army. But the Portuguese made them regular members in the army and gave them military traininmg. As Woodcock says, "Converts were often given high military and civil posts, and some were even ennobled." The Portuguese used Syrian Christian troops externsively in their campaigns. During Hyder Ali's invasion, this well trained Syrian Christian army protected Christian churches and property. The main objecive of Portuguese relations with Indian communities was the encouragement of inter-marriage. As Panikkar says, " From the social and political point of view it may be noted that converts to Christianity enjoyed all privileges of the Portuguese citizens, and no distinction based on colour or race was recognised." A Nair convert, named Antonio Fernabdes Chale, held various commands and was made a Knight of the Order of Christ. He died fighting at the battle of the river Sanguiler in 1571 and was buried with honours in Goa. A suuden surge in the economic and social status of the Syrians occurred during the Portuguese rule in Kochi. But it was a minority elite class that enjoyed their favour and the vast majority remained totally neglected like other lower castes. Dr. Buchanan on his interview with a senior priest in Mavelikara, in the year 1806, elicit a brief account of the degenerated social status of Syrian Christians. According to him, Syrian Christians had to seek the protection of Hindu Princes and the dispersed Christians further became the victims of encroachment by other communities.

A.Yeshuratnam said...

Military Service of Syrians
Portuguese rule had serious consequences on the social status of Syrian Christians. Till the Portiuguese arrival, the vast majority of Syrian Christiasns had been eking out a living like other lower caste Hindus. Altough the earlier immigrant Christians from West Asia were treated well by the Kerala rulers by giving them, their wives from utouchable castes and their offspring certain privileges, when Christian population increased by intermarriages with lower castes (who alone were avaiolable for such marriages in a caste-ridden society) and conversion of lower castes, Christians gradually lost all the privileges and were treated on par with other lower castes.In Travancore they had to do oozhiyam service even after the British brought the State under their control. But during the brief period of Portuguese rule, Syrian Christians enjoyed real freedom. Their economic and social status was raised by the Portuguese. This aspect in Syrian history is overlooked by many historians because of the bickerings over the Synod of Dampier. Some St. Thomas Christians project the Portuguese as enemies and by attacking them they don the role of pretentious patriots.But patriotism often changed according to political circumstances. When the Portuguese first arrived, Syrian Christians were glad to receive them. K.M.Panikkar says they forgot all the help done by Hindu rulers and " at the very first opportunity, they hastened to disclaim their allegiance and to accept the sovereignty of the King of Portugal." He also quotes Kerala Pazhama which gives detailed information about the visit of Syrian Christians to Vasco da Gama and how they suurendered all their privileges and accepted the Portuguese king as their king.
The Portuguese exercised political supremacy in Kochi for about 150 years. Kochi Rjah was made a vassal of the Portuguese king. The crown of the Kochi Rajah was made in, and sent from Portugal. During this period, the Portuguese extended all privileges to Syrian Christians.They were glad to see Christians in a foreign country and wanted to make them their loyal ally. Native rulers used Syrian Christians as mercenaries in their army. But the Portuguese made them regular members in the army and gave them military traininmg. As Woodcock says, "Converts were often given high military and civil posts, and some were even ennobled." The Portuguese used Syrian Christian troops externsively in their campaigns. During Hyder Ali's invasion, this well trained Syrian Christian army protected Christian churches and property. The main objecive of Portuguese relations with Indian communities was the encouragement of inter-marriage. As Panikkar says, " From the social and political point of view it may be noted that converts to Christianity enjoyed all privileges of the Portuguese citizens, and no distinction based on colour or race was recognised." A Nair convert, named Antonio Fernabdes Chale, held various commands and was made a Knight of the Order of Christ. He died fighting at the battle of the river Sanguiler in 1571 and was buried with honours in Goa. A suuden surge in the economic and social status of the Syrians occurred during the Portuguese rule in Kochi. But it was a minority elite class that enjoyed their favour and the vast majority remained totally neglected like other lower castes. Dr. Buchanan on his interview with a senior priest in Mavelikara, in the year 1806, elicit a brief account of the degenerated social status of Syrian Christians. According to him, Syrian Christians had to seek the protection of Hindu Princes and the dispersed Christians further became the victims of encroachment by other communities.

Anonymous said...

You can read more about in these books..

 Neill, Stephen-(1707-1858) A History of Christianity in India:, Volume 2
 Neill, Stephen – (1977) A history of Christian missions
 Neill, Stephen- The story of the Christian church in India and Pakistan
 Eric Frykenberg, Robert- Christianity in India
 Hough, James – 1845 - The history of Christianity in India: Volume 4
 Sir William Kaye, John- Christianity in India
 Bruce Firth, Cyril- An introduction to Indian church history
 Hunter, W.W. – (1886) The Indian Empire ; Its People History and Products pp 240
 Logan,William – (1887) Malabar Manual pp 119
 Nangam Aiya, V.-(1906) The Travancore State Manual Volume 2 pp 243
 Barton ,John M. –(1872) The Syrian Christians: Narrative of a Tour in the Travancore Mission of the Church Missionary Society Mission Life, Vol. III
 Geddes, Michael- (1694) A short History of the Church of Malabar
 Henry, J. & Parker, J - The Christians of St. Thomas and their liturgies
 Milne Rae, George- Syrian Church in India
 Whitehouse,Thomas – (1873) Lingerings of light in a dark land: researches into the Syrian church of Malabar
 Brown, Leslie- The Indian Christians of St Thomas
 David Macbride, John – (1856) - The Syrian church in India
 Joseph, TK- Six St. Thomases of South India